This website is in progress. I would love your help to discuss how to a better, more enlightened society. There is a cost to news propaganda - citizens become more opinionated, less informed and less able to consider multiple perspectives. Lets promote varied voices, ideas, perspectives and diversity. Want to help? Great, email me.
​
How do we facilitate a dialog that synthesizes the cacophony of views and voices to advance a better society? How do we acknowledge our own biases to build a system that is not agenda driven- discourse as discovery and adventure rather than propaganda. How do we moderate a platform, a dialog to allow objective and credible analysis - a synthesis of ideas to emerge? Is there a better model beyond the Dialectic? A synthesis of not only a thesis and antithesis but a simultaneous merger if the multitude of ideas, perspectives and emotions?
​
Is the dialectic method inherently flawed? Overly susceptible to tribalistic impulses? seems to entrench sides into a false either/or dichotomy (typically both overly simplified to the point of mutual falsity) rather than reflecting the complexities of reality.
​
Critique of Narrative:
How to we critically analyze the narratives being propagated? How do we promote individual narratives over the violence of metanarratives.
How do perspectives and narratives of love and empathy compete with truth and survival? Can we create a better socio-political philosophy?
​
The evolution of culture, of thought of politic. Lets create a better society, one that is more fun, open and synthetic.
​